Dynamic Stereo Sampling

My advice is : Trust your ears.

Stereo sampling may give the sound a "wider spatial orientation" but if the samples looping, velocity layering, cross-fading etc are crap, it will still be lousy.
 
lowjk said:
My advice is : Trust your ears.

Stereo sampling may give the sound a "wider spatial orientation" but if the samples looping, velocity layering, cross-fading etc are crap, it will still be lousy.

i mean if u just comparing digi pianos wif and without DSS.
is the diff significance? thsk
 
piano said:
lowjk said:
My advice is : Trust your ears.

Stereo sampling may give the sound a "wider spatial orientation" but if the samples looping, velocity layering, cross-fading etc are crap, it will still be lousy.

i mean if u just comparing digi pianos wif and without DSS.
is the diff significance? thsk

I understand your question. My point is fancy labelling is just a marketing gimmick.

Example ROMpler playback sound engines can be known as:
1) HI synthesis system (Korg)
2) AWM2 (Yamaha)
3) XV engine (Roland)

Ultimately to the musician, it really doesn't matter. You just buy what sounds good.

Trust your ears.
 
generally speaking, if you're looking at dss patches, you might want to give the Yamaha P250 a try. its sound patches are excellent, and u really can tell its stero. buy a good pair of headphones, plug it into anykeyboard u want to buy, and crank up the volume. listen carefully to each and every note, played soft/loud/with sustain depressed.

the difference is very very clear and significant.
 
Back
Top